Piston Discussion (Was - Re: Building my 360/390 for towing)

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

Post Reply
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

Piston Discussion (Was - Re: Building my 360/390 for towing)

Post by sideoilerfe »

Here's some piston information...
Last edited by DuckRyder on Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Title for split topic.
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
User avatar
fomocoguy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1548
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by fomocoguy »

I believe that photo is correct for early model engines but not so much later. The 360 I tore down for my build was in a 93k mile truck (1976 I believe) and had never been rebuilt. The pistons are std size and are stamped "360" but are identicle to the ones on the right with the partial skirt. I think at some point Ford realized it was a little silly to use different pistons for a 4v car and a 360 truck motor when they are exactly the same pin height and bore. Do you mind me asking where that pic is from? Any ideas when it was published?
Joe

1971 F100 flareside 8ft
1964 Chrysler New Yorker Town and Country wagon
2006 Dodge Ram 2500 cummins
2005 Ford Ranger
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

Re: Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by sideoilerfe »

fomocoguy wrote: Do you mind me asking where that pic is from? Any ideas when it was published?
How to rebuild big block Ford engines by Steve Christ

C. 1983 Well after FE's production stopped .
fomocoguy wrote:I believe that photo is correct for early model engines but not so much later. The 360 I tore down for my build was in a 93k mile truck (1976 I believe) and had never been rebuilt. The pistons are std size and are stamped "360" but are identicle to the ones on the right with the partial skirt. I think at some point Ford realized it was a little silly to use different pistons for a 4v car and a 360 truck motor when they are exactly the same pin height and bore.
They stopped putting FE's in cars in 1971. 360's have a 1.776 pin height and the longer 6.54" rod. 390's have 1.68 PH with a 6.488" rod. 360/390 have the same deck height so how was a 360 piston the same as a 390 piston when different length rods were used?
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
User avatar
fomocoguy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1548
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by fomocoguy »

Because 390 car 4v pistons sit at zero deck and have the identicle pin height as a 360 piston. Some original 360 pistons are even stamped "4v 390" right on the side. 390 truck pistons have the shorter pin height and are slightly recessed into the block at TDC. That is why a truck 390 has a much lower cr than a car 390 of the same year. Here, check out the compression distance on these TRW's: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/360-390- ... ccessories
Note they are labled as 360 -390 pistons. Also look at the compression distance on these: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Speed-Pr ... ccessories
Now note the compression distance on these 390 truck pistons: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/390-FORD ... ccessories
Original truck 390 pistons have the shorter pin height, 4 valve reliefs, and a dish. 2v car pistons have the taller pin height, 4 valve reliefs, and dish. 4v car pistons have just the valve reliefs, no dish.

I am not trying to argue, just stating facts. The picture in Steve's book is wrong; I will be happy to take pictures on the pin height, partial skirts, fomoco stamping, 360 stamping, C8*** casting number, and standard bore of the 360 pistons I have if you would like to see them.
Joe

1971 F100 flareside 8ft
1964 Chrysler New Yorker Town and Country wagon
2006 Dodge Ram 2500 cummins
2005 Ford Ranger
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4941
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

Re: Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by DuckRyder »

390 truck pistons ARE 410 mercury pistons.

Image

Image

My 360 had the slipper skirt pistons when it was torn down, it did not appear to have ever been apart. I didn't measure them and I don't still have them.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

Re: Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by sideoilerfe »

DuckRyder wrote:390 truck pistons ARE 410 mercury pistons.
After market ones are. Factory 410 pistons had a compression height of 1.687" as factory 390 truck pistons had a height of 1.680" 0.007" difference; very close but still different. Factory 360 pistons had a compression height of 1.776 as the factory car 390 4V piston had a compression height of 1.7919; 0.0159" difference. The car 390 2V had a height of 1.787. The car 390 2V pistons and the 360 pistons have a difference of 0.011" in compression height. Aftermarket 360 pistons have the slipper skirt.

So, there is a difference in the factory pistons. The aftermarket 360 and the 2V car 390 pistons are probably the same as Fomoco stated. Same goes with the aftermarket 390 truck and 410 Mercury pistons. Fact is, you can get any piston custom made for anything so it really doesn't matter.
fomocoguy wrote:Because 390 car 4v pistons sit at zero deck and have the identicle pin height as a 360 piston. Some original 360 pistons are even stamped "4v 390" right on the side. 390 truck pistons have the shorter pin height and are slightly recessed into the block at TDC. That is why a truck 390 has a much lower cr than a car 390 of the same year. Here, check out the compression distance on these TRW's: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/360-390- ... ccessories
Note they are labled as 360 -390 pistons. Also look at the compression distance on these: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Speed-Pr ... ccessories
Now note the compression distance on these 390 truck pistons: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/390-FORD ... ccessories
Original truck 390 pistons have the shorter pin height, 4 valve reliefs, and a dish. 2v car pistons have the taller pin height, 4 valve reliefs, and dish. 4v car pistons have just the valve reliefs, no dish.
Well, the 2nd link you provided are 460 pistons.
fomocoguy wrote:I am not trying to argue, just stating facts. The picture in Steve's book is wrong;
You shouldn't make untrue accusations. I've torn apart two 360s find full skirted pistons. Just because yours had slipper skirts does not mean the book is wrong. You think it had never been torn apart but people lie all the time to sell things.
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
User avatar
fomocoguy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1548
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by fomocoguy »

sideoilerfe wrote: 360's have a 1.776 pin height and the longer 6.54" rod. 390's have 1.68 PH with a 6.488" rod. 360/390 have the same deck height so how was a 360 piston the same as a 390 piston when different length rods were used?
This was the statement that started all this, implying that 360 pistons and 390 pistons were not interchangeble becasue of rod length.

sideoilerfe wrote: After market ones are. Factory 410 pistons had a compression height of 1.687" as factory 390 truck pistons had a height of 1.680" 0.007" difference; very close but still different. Factory 360 pistons had a compression height of 1.776 as the factory car 390 4V piston had a compression height of 1.7919; 0.0159" difference. The car 390 2V had a height of 1.787. The car 390 2V pistons and the 360 pistons have a difference of 0.011" in compression height. Aftermarket 360 pistons have the slipper skirt.
So aside from splitting hairs of .007", .0159", and .011" I am correct and they are interchangeable.
sideoilerfe wrote:You shouldn't make untrue accusations. I've torn apart two 360s find full skirted pistons. Just because yours had slipper skirts does not mean the book is wrong. You think it had never been torn apart but people lie all the time to sell things.
The book is wrong. My pistons are stamped 1968 (C8***) and have the std bore, fomoco stamp, and correct pin height. The book should say SOME 360's, period. Tonight I will take pictures of it all.
Steve's book is great, but nobody is perfect. He has other mistakes in it too, like the notion of high nickle content blocks, an old wives tale.

The 460 pistons were my bad. I was typing in duress of a fussy baby and an even fussier woman...
Joe

1971 F100 flareside 8ft
1964 Chrysler New Yorker Town and Country wagon
2006 Dodge Ram 2500 cummins
2005 Ford Ranger
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4941
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by DuckRyder »

I would like to see actual measurements. ALL of the books on FE's are riddled with mistakes, Steve Christ's book is no exception despite its overall goodness.

I do not recall how my 360 pistons were marked, I do know that they were slipper skirts and were in horrible shape. :wink: There are however way too many reports of people taking apart 360's and finding pistons marked "390" and truck 390's and finding pistons marked "410" for it to all be fantasy.

I do not know for sure what the "truth" is here, but where Ford production in the late 60's and early 70's is concerned I would be very careful about making statements of absolutes... :wink:
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
User avatar
fomocoguy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1548
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by fomocoguy »

DuckRyder wrote:I would like to see actual measurements. ALL of the books on FE's are riddled with mistakes, Steve Christ's book is no exception despite its overall goodness.

I do not recall how my 360 pistons were marked, I do know that they were slipper skirts and were in horrible shape. :wink: There are however way too many reports of people taking apart 360's and finding pistons marked "390" and truck 390's and finding pistons marked "410" for it to all be fantasy.

I do not know for sure what the "truth" is here, but where Ford production in the late 60's and early 70's is concerned I would be very careful about making statements of absolutes... :wink:
Absolutely! Not only do I have pictures, but I have some concrete evidence. First the pics:
Image
Notice these are stamped "360" and "4V". No 4v 360's were built to my knowledge, so that would have to be for the 390.
Image
Stock bore
Image

Stock pin height
Image
FOMOCO stamp
Image
Casting stamp- C8AE6110AA
According to silvolite this crosses to the OE ford number for 360 truck engines. Look at the last one on the page. http://webpages.charter.net/beckracing/slvpg49.htm
These were caked in carbon and had every indication that they were original. I've already cleaned them a bit and cleaned the grooves.
Joe

1971 F100 flareside 8ft
1964 Chrysler New Yorker Town and Country wagon
2006 Dodge Ram 2500 cummins
2005 Ford Ranger
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

Re: Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by sideoilerfe »

fomocoguy wrote:
Image
That's very accurate :roll: I could angle the camera any way I wanted to get any reading I wanted. Why don't you start with measuring things correctly.

fomocoguy wrote:These were caked in carbon and had every indication that they were original. I've already cleaned them a bit and cleaned the grooves.
Big deal. Lot's of rebuilt engines have carbon on the pistons after years of usage. There's carbon in my exhaust pipes too I guess that means they're original.
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
User avatar
fomocoguy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1548
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by fomocoguy »

sideoilerfe wrote:
fomocoguy wrote:
Image
That's very accurate :roll: I could angle the camera any way I wanted to get any reading I wanted. Why don't you start with measuring things correctly.

fomocoguy wrote:These were caked in carbon and had every indication that they were original. I've already cleaned them a bit and cleaned the grooves.
Big deal. Lot's of rebuilt engines have carbon on the pistons after years of usage. There's carbon in my exhaust pipes too I guess that means they're original.
Sorry I don't have any other means to measure it, but why oh why on gods green earth would I fake the pin height? HOW could I fake the pin height when the pistons are stamped 360 and we all already know and agree that 360's have the taller pin height???
One thing my camera can not fake is the oem casting number. It speaks for itself.
This is not an attack on you, so I'm really not sure why it sounds like it's turning personal. I have no reason to pull underhanded dirty tricks like faking measurements. There is a pleathora of misinformation out there and I was under the assumption that we are all here to learn from one another. This is all good, pertinent information. I'm sorry if you are offended by it.
Joe

1971 F100 flareside 8ft
1964 Chrysler New Yorker Town and Country wagon
2006 Dodge Ram 2500 cummins
2005 Ford Ranger
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

Re: Building my 360/390 for towing

Post by sideoilerfe »

I think Ryan has most of his answers by now.

There is a lot of bad information out there. Best thing to do is to talk to an FE expert at a reputable machine shop about your build and they can help you from there.
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4941
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

Re: Piston Discussion (Was - Re: Building my 360/390 for towing)

Post by DuckRyder »

As you fellows can see I've split this off so the piston discussion can continue as long as it remains civil, any more personal attacks and the thread will be gone. It might take a member with it.

In short discussion is healthy and encouraged, accusations and personal attacks are not.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
JEF199
New Member
New Member
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 7:06 pm

Re: Piston Discussion (Was - Re: Building my 360/390 for towing)

Post by JEF199 »

one ? or mabey two...Can you use the 352/360 rods along with the 390 crank? And just mill piston tops to get propper deck height? would that lighten the bob weight to much trowing the ballance off? I guess thats three :lol:

I know that the rods are weaker but for a truck engine under 5000 rpms they should be fine. I was just thinking that the longer rods would help build torque.
  • 1966 Ford Mustang (My First Car)
    • 1972 F250 360 3-speed
      • 1984 Bronco
      1999 Eddie Bauer Expedition
    2006 F250 5.4 Super Duty 4-door
User avatar
fomocoguy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1548
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: Piston Discussion (Was - Re: Building my 360/390 for towing)

Post by fomocoguy »

JEF199 wrote:one ? or mabey two...Can you use the 352/360 rods along with the 390 crank? And just mill piston tops to get propper deck height? would that lighten the bob weight to much trowing the ballance off? I guess thats three :lol:

I know that the rods are weaker but for a truck engine under 5000 rpms they should be fine. I was just thinking that the longer rods would help build torque.
I wouldn't just because I wouldn't want to compromise the tops of the pistons. They are under an awful amount of heat and pressure and it would make it much more vulnerable to burning a hole in one under the right or wrong conditions. You could have a good machinist check and see if there is enough material there for you, but I would think you could buy all the proper parts for less than it would cost to have all the pistons machined. As for the stroke, that is dictated by the throw of the crank, so the longer rods wouldn't really affect it. Wether you have a longer rod with a shorter piston or a shorter rod with a longer piston, the overall rod+piston length will be the same.
Joe

1971 F100 flareside 8ft
1964 Chrysler New Yorker Town and Country wagon
2006 Dodge Ram 2500 cummins
2005 Ford Ranger
Post Reply