Confused about power ratings.
Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder
-
- New Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:33 pm
- Location: Texas
Confused about power ratings.
I'm a little confused about how much power the FE 360 2V in my grandpa's 1972 F100 Explorer Special put out from the factory. The ID plate claims an un-whopping 156 SAE certified hp, while my LMC catalog claims a much better sounding 215 hp. What in the world is with the 59 hp difference? Can someone clarify this mystery to me and mabey tell me what the actuall hp made by this motor is? Thanks.
1972 Ford F-100 2WD 131"wb
Sport Custom cab w/ Explorer trim package D
Seqouia Brown Metallic with Ginger Random Stripe cloth and vinyl
360 FE block w/ C6 and Ford 9"
100% all original, until it gets restored.
Sport Custom cab w/ Explorer trim package D
Seqouia Brown Metallic with Ginger Random Stripe cloth and vinyl
360 FE block w/ C6 and Ford 9"
100% all original, until it gets restored.
-
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 22330
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Kansas, Ottawa
- Contact:
Re: Confused about power ratings.
i read soemthing abou tford under estimating the hp on the vin tag. dont trust lmc though.
-
- Blue Oval Fan
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:44 pm
- Location: Plymouth Michigan
- Contact:
Re: Confused about power ratings.
Ford would put a lower hp rating on there just so that it would cost less for customers to buy the truck and to lower other costs.
Justin
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=47482
http://s976.photobucket.com/home/bb429power/allalbums go to both of the albums.
1967 Ford F100 longbed with a 466 500+hp/600+ft-lbs (mine)
1969 Mercury Cougar xr7 with a 351w (dads, I helped alot)
1970 Ford Maverick with a 302 (became our drag car)
1986 f150 5.0 (my DD)
"Many can argue, but it takes a real man to apologize."-Me
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=47482
http://s976.photobucket.com/home/bb429power/allalbums go to both of the albums.
1967 Ford F100 longbed with a 466 500+hp/600+ft-lbs (mine)
1969 Mercury Cougar xr7 with a 351w (dads, I helped alot)
1970 Ford Maverick with a 302 (became our drag car)
1986 f150 5.0 (my DD)
"Many can argue, but it takes a real man to apologize."-Me
- 70_F100
- Moderator
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:23 am
- Location: North Carolina, Kernersville
Re: Confused about power ratings.
Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools talk because they have to say something.--Plato
Why is it that there's seldom time to fix it right the first time, but there's always time to fix it right the second time???
That's not an oil leak
That's SWEAT from all that HORSEPOWER!! 
Why is it that there's seldom time to fix it right the first time, but there's always time to fix it right the second time???
That's not an oil leak


- hotrodfeguy
- Blue Oval Fan
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 4:49 pm
- Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
- Contact:
Re: Confused about power ratings.
Factory power ratings were way under rated case in point look at the 428CJ making 335hp. The 302 Boss was rated at 290 by comparison. I think there was more than 45HP change there.
1972 F-250 4X4 390
1999 F-350 7.3 PS 4X4
1996 Ford ranger 3.0
1999 F-350 7.3 PS 4X4
1996 Ford ranger 3.0
- 70_F100
- Moderator
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:23 am
- Location: North Carolina, Kernersville
Re: Confused about power ratings.
Keep in mind that in 1971, SAE HP ratings were changed from gross to net.
Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools talk because they have to say something.--Plato
Why is it that there's seldom time to fix it right the first time, but there's always time to fix it right the second time???
That's not an oil leak
That's SWEAT from all that HORSEPOWER!! 
Why is it that there's seldom time to fix it right the first time, but there's always time to fix it right the second time???
That's not an oil leak


-
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:06 am
- Location: Williamsburg,Virginia
Re: Confused about power ratings.
ive got a 69 brocure and it says 215@4400 gross hp and 327@2600 tq, with a 8.4 compression ratio. i know yours is a 72.
- Dragon
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 2659
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
- Contact:
Re: Confused about power ratings.
FEs were gone before cams were retarded and other really silly stuff so the Net to SAE power change showed two identical engines being rated way different with the same compression, displacement, carb and cam. When the world switched to SAE then the numbers between Ford and Chevy and Chrysler were easier to get the truth from.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away.
My Gallery
Spark test
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away.

My Gallery
Spark test
- averagef250
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 4387
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
- Location: Oregon, Beavercreek
Re: Confused about power ratings.
150HP is actually a lot of HP. I don't think very many people really appreciate what 1HP is and what it feels like when you put, say 150HP to the ground and do work with it.
HP can be a pretty meaningless number as it's always been miss-represented by automakers. It's like the 6.5HP home depot air compressor that actually only puts out 1.5 HP.
HP can be a pretty meaningless number as it's always been miss-represented by automakers. It's like the 6.5HP home depot air compressor that actually only puts out 1.5 HP.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
-
- Preferred User
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:31 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Confused about power ratings.
My guess is that one is at the flywheel, the other at the rear wheels, but I could be wrong. For example, the 210 hp rated 98 F150 I had with a 4.6 would probably only put down 160-170 to the rear wheels, if I had to guess. And that's with a much more efficient tranny than the c-6's my 71 and 72 are running.DiamondGBar87 wrote:I'm a little confused about how much power the FE 360 2V in my grandpa's 1972 F100 Explorer Special put out from the factory. The ID plate claims an un-whopping 156 SAE certified hp, while my LMC catalog claims a much better sounding 215 hp. What in the world is with the 59 hp difference? Can someone clarify this mystery to me and mabey tell me what the actuall hp made by this motor is? Thanks.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:33 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Confused about power ratings.
Thanks for the info. I really appreciate all the help. I'm trying to find out all that I can so I can do a 100% factory correct documented restoration on this truck. It was the first vehicle that my grandpa bought new, so it holds a special place in my heart. Plus from what I have gleamed from this site it seems that the Explorer Special is a kinda rare and desirable package to have.
1972 Ford F-100 2WD 131"wb
Sport Custom cab w/ Explorer trim package D
Seqouia Brown Metallic with Ginger Random Stripe cloth and vinyl
360 FE block w/ C6 and Ford 9"
100% all original, until it gets restored.
Sport Custom cab w/ Explorer trim package D
Seqouia Brown Metallic with Ginger Random Stripe cloth and vinyl
360 FE block w/ C6 and Ford 9"
100% all original, until it gets restored.