what carb

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

Post Reply
User avatar
michael69
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 8:53 pm
Location: South Carolina,Walhalla

what carb

Post by michael69 »

What is the best carb to run on a mostly stock 302 engine? A vacuum or mechanical secondary? And would a 600cfm be about the right size. It will have an auto transmission also. Thanks
Michael69

'69 Ranger 'F-100 2WD SWB 351W C6 AUTO
1985 CJ 7 jeep w/35s
1967 SS Chevelle 502 4 speed
2003 Heritage softail w/110 cubic inch screamin eagle kit
User avatar
hotrodfeguy
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 699
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 4:49 pm
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: what carb

Post by hotrodfeguy »

1972 F-250 4X4 390
1999 F-350 7.3 PS 4X4
1996 Ford ranger 3.0
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: what carb

Post by Dragon »

A 302 at 5000 rpm with stock 4V manifold and no cam is at a maximum 85% Volumetric Efficient. Given those 3 numbers At max rpm you need 371 so I would go with the for future minor engine changes. A 390 would hold you back in the future.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

Re: what carb

Post by sideoilerfe »

371 CFM he might as well keep the 2V autolite. Besides, 302's like RPMs anyway so, a 500 would be pretty good for a stockish motor IMO.
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
User avatar
michael69
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 8:53 pm
Location: South Carolina,Walhalla

Re: what carb

Post by michael69 »

The motor has been rebuilt pretty much stock with a rv cam and has headers, it has an edelbrock performer intake an edelbrock carb now I think its a 600. I just don't like the edelbrock and wanted to change to holley just didn't know where to start as for size. THANKS
Michael69

'69 Ranger 'F-100 2WD SWB 351W C6 AUTO
1985 CJ 7 jeep w/35s
1967 SS Chevelle 502 4 speed
2003 Heritage softail w/110 cubic inch screamin eagle kit
george worley
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 3:09 pm
Location: Orlando,FL.

Re: what carb

Post by george worley »

A 600 cfm should be about right and will work good with future engine mods. as long as you aren't building a full out race engine. :2cents:
cdeal28078
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1982
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:45 am
Location: North Carolina, Huntersville

Re: what carb

Post by cdeal28078 »

I myself think a lot of people use too large a carb. I would go with the 450 at most. It is a great little carb. A lot of people putting 4v's on the 300's use the 350 cfm's and like them but they turn less RPM's, Heck, I am running an 1850 Holley that is 600 CFM on my mild low compression 460 in my 71 F100 and it runs nice and clean with great throttle response
clint
71 F100 SportCustom
460 C6. Disc Brake/Power-steering/automatic Swap. 3.00
1986 Bronco 5.0 AOD
bb429power
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:44 pm
Location: Plymouth Michigan
Contact:

Re: what carb

Post by bb429power »

george worley wrote:A 600 cfm should be about right and will work good with future engine mods. as long as you aren't building a full out race engine. :2cents:
Took the words right out of my mouth. I have heard that the holley 600cfm carbs are crap. But I have one on a stock cammed 302 and it runs great. Its a 4160 series carb.
Justin
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=47482
http://s976.photobucket.com/home/bb429power/allalbums go to both of the albums.
1967 Ford F100 longbed with a 466 500+hp/600+ft-lbs (mine)
1969 Mercury Cougar xr7 with a 351w (dads, I helped alot)
1970 Ford Maverick with a 302 (became our drag car)
1986 f150 5.0 (my DD)
"Many can argue, but it takes a real man to apologize."-Me
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: what carb

Post by Dragon »

Yeah the Holley 1850 or 600 cfm carb since 1992 is no more crap than any other Holley. All Holleys had a problem with backfiring blowing the power valve before 1992.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
fitzwell
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 779
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: East of a rock, west of a hard place

Re: what carb

Post by fitzwell »

for most applications, the old 1850 works like a champ. If you can find a 4180 series holley ( 84-85 351H.O. pickups) grab it. Put a Holley kit in it and drop the jets to about a 58-59. Runs like a champ & gets killer fuel milage, if you can keep your foot out of it :wink:
As a metter of fact, i AM trying to keep up with the Jones'
Driving like Parnelli, Drinkin' like George
-------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: what carb

Post by Dragon »

Or take any Holley and put a two stage power Valve in it and you don't have all the smog ports and frozen in place idle mixture needles.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
fitzwell
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 779
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: East of a rock, west of a hard place

Re: what carb

Post by fitzwell »

Dragon wrote:Or take any Holley and put a two stage power Valve in it and you don't have all the smog ports and frozen in place idle mixture needles.

You also loose the annular discharge boosters.

Ports off the float bowls are capped, or plugged with a small freeze plug, cap the vac ports you don't need, use the correct one above the throttle plates & you're good to go.

Idle mixture caps are no match for a die grinder :wink:


as always, :2cents:
As a metter of fact, i AM trying to keep up with the Jones'
Driving like Parnelli, Drinkin' like George
-------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: what carb

Post by Dragon »

fitzwell wrote: You also loose the annular discharge boosters.
:
How do you lose the boosters?
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
fitzwell
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 779
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: East of a rock, west of a hard place

Re: what carb

Post by fitzwell »

Dragon wrote:
fitzwell wrote: You also loose the annular discharge boosters.
:
How do you lose the boosters?

You loose the advantage gained by having annular discharge boosters

4160 style carbs have a "standard" booster, single hole for fuel discharge. 4180 series uses "annular discharge" boosters. Several small holes in the booster for fuel.

Guess i'm too lazy to type, sorry for the "cut & paste", but this covers it pretty well.. from a car craft tech article.


"In the early days of performance carburetors, boosters projected straight out from the upper portion of the carburetor barrel above the venturi. Later, downleg boosters were used to place the trailing end of the booster closer to the highest velocity point in the venturi. Both of these boosters employ a single fuel discharge point, relying on the shearing effect of high-velocity air moving past the booster to atomize the fuel.

Finally, there is the annular booster, which is slightly larger in diameter than the downleg and employs a series of small discharge holes drilled into the inside circumference of the booster to improve fuel atomization. This annular design accomplishes several things. At lower engine speeds, slow air speed creates a weak signal, which reduces the amount of fuel moving through the booster. An annular discharge booster's multiple holes offer many points for the fuel to enter the venturi as opposed to a single discharge point. At lower air speeds, this offers measurable advantages, especially when combined with the annular's better signal strength. This is important for situations where large-volume carburetors are used in conjunction with a long-duration camshaft. With a weak manifold-vacuum signal at idle, annular-discharge boosters can greatly improve throttle response and driveability.

Of course, annular boosters aren't exactly a free ride. First, the annular's larger size presents a slight airflow restriction, reducing the carburetors' total capacity compared to smaller downleg boosters. Second, with all other variables equal, an annular booster creates a stronger fuel signal, generally requiring smaller jet sizes. There are exceptions to this rule, but adding annular-discharge boosters requires smaller main jets and larger high-speed air bleeds compared to the downleg style.
"
As a metter of fact, i AM trying to keep up with the Jones'
Driving like Parnelli, Drinkin' like George
-------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: what carb

Post by Dragon »

Okay that threw me. The 4180 was a blend of Autolite and Holley technology. It would be nice if Holley embraced annular discharge on all the carbs.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
Post Reply