Any thoughts (or better yet, experiences) with fuel mileage between a 390 and a 428?? (all else being equal of course)
I have both and both need complete rebuild. Obviously the 428 will give me more HP but at what cost regarding fuel mileage???
428 vs 390
Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder
- snake
- Preferred User
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:20 pm
- Location: Eastern Iowa
428 vs 390
"It's better to be hated for who you are than loved for who you're not....." Van Zant
"If you can't say something good then there's nothing good to say...." Big and Rich
"If you can't say something good then there's nothing good to say...." Big and Rich
- mrtleavitt
- Blue Oval Fanatic
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:26 pm
- Location: Overton, NV
Re: 428 vs 390
Not enough difference to keep you from going with the 428. My bro runs a 390 and I run a 428. Both get 7-12 mpg depending on how we drive them.
1969 F100 428 with T19, 3.00 9inch 31 spline w/ Detroit Trutrac, '74 frame swap successful!
http://s43.photobucket.com/albums/e356/mrtleavitt/
http://s43.photobucket.com/albums/e356/mrtleavitt/
- ximy
- Preferred User
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:18 pm
- Location: socal
Re: 428 vs 390
wow.. I've built 390's and 428's but never considered mileage...
... the 390 makes more than enough power for any standard use... the 428 will blow your socks off with torque... give it mild upgrades.. manifold, carb, cam, header... and Holy Smokes!!!

1967 f250 428
- snake
- Preferred User
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:20 pm
- Location: Eastern Iowa
Re: 428 vs 390
I don't know that I'm really 'concerned' about the mileage since it will not be a 'daily drive' but if I ever get the truck back on the road, I will use it for hauling things and at some point I will use it to pull a trailer occasionally(vintage stock car).
Again, I say all things being equal since any rebuild components and services as well as upgrades (intake, headers etc) are essentially identical and have the same costs...
I was kinda thinking that it only makes sense to do the 428 but wanted to get some input in case there is a drastic difference in mileage. As stated above, I'm sure the 390 will do just fine for what I want but since I have the 428 too, why not???
Thanks for the input and any additional comments are also appreciated.
Again, I say all things being equal since any rebuild components and services as well as upgrades (intake, headers etc) are essentially identical and have the same costs...
I was kinda thinking that it only makes sense to do the 428 but wanted to get some input in case there is a drastic difference in mileage. As stated above, I'm sure the 390 will do just fine for what I want but since I have the 428 too, why not???
Thanks for the input and any additional comments are also appreciated.
"It's better to be hated for who you are than loved for who you're not....." Van Zant
"If you can't say something good then there's nothing good to say...." Big and Rich
"If you can't say something good then there's nothing good to say...." Big and Rich
- ximy
- Preferred User
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:18 pm
- Location: socal
Re: 428 vs 390
build a stock or mild 428 then.. it can pull planets out of their orbits 

1967 f250 428
-
- Blue Oval Guru
- Posts: 1080
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: Texas, Iowa Park
Re: 428 vs 390


